the pursuit of hunting, target shooting and 'stump' shooting for a while using firearms, bows and arrows and pellets.
I've launched countless projectiles at live game and at various, sundry, targets. I've hit them, I've missed them...but overall, I'd say I've missed FAR MORE than I've hit.
many years ago, when it was still open to hunt on, my son and i went to Santa Cruz Island where there was (and probably still is) an over abundance of wild sheep and wild pigs. as many of you know from your history, the early Spanish explorers stocked the Channel Islands off the coast of California with goats, pigs and sheep in order to have a captive population of food animals. these animals have no natural predators to keep their populations under control...(well...there is a species of fox that live there but they're rare and protected by law and they're only the size of your average house cat...hardly a threat to a goat, sheep or pig.) hunting was permitted in order to keep them in check.
i took a compound bow and a recurve bow and we both took a generous supply of arrows. my son was shooting a compound bow.
we were to be there for two full days so time spent in pursuit was at a premium.
the time came where i finally had a nice ram within my bow range. i estimated him at near a full curl.
i was, at the time, hunting with my recurve bow, a 65# Bear, Kodiak Hunter and shooting Easton 2219 arrows tipped with deadly sharp, zwickey, black diamond, broadheads.
now, I'm not a great hunter, in fact, I'm probably below average in hunting skills, but i managed somehow, to close the gap on this fine ram to within 15 yards; i did everything right on this particular stalk, i suppose.
when "the moment of truth" came, i did not feel the strength of the draw of the 65# bow at all...i had so much adrenaline flowing i felt like i was going to break the bow.
when the bow settled on the spot where i felt it was right, i loosed the arrow only to see and hear it strike a huge oak tree limb that the ram was grazing under; it sounded almost like a rifle shot it was so loud. I'd shot over his back by a good three feet!
the startled animal jumped straight up in the air, came back down, looked around and resumed browsing after what seemed to be hours, but was in reality, seconds. i had remained motionless and had, somehow, been overlooked in his sweeping, self-preservation, looks around himself.
i put another arrow on the string making sure to muffle the sound of the nock snapping on to the string so as not to alert the wary animal while all the time making sure not to make any rapid, unnecessary, movement.
by then, i thought the adrenaline was going to blow out my eardrums...i was getting a second chance...highly unusual in this pursuit...one seldom gets two shots at the same game animal he just missed with the first shot.
this time the shot went high over his back, once again...the arrow clacked harmlessly into the thick undergrowth 10 to 15 yards beyond the unsuspecting animal.
i was really frustrated by then and didn't really know what to do.
i decided to try again and like a dummy, i stood up, partially exposing myself and started my draw. dumb move...the animal jerked his head around looking at me directly and took off like a shot...
what lesson(s) did i learn from that experience? well...for one thing...to "take my time and AIM the shot"...you can't hit ANYTHING if you don't aim at it. the finest equipment in the world will not help you if you don't use it CORRECTLY.
i was to repeat that very same experience more times down through the years.
once on a grazing deer, TWICE on javelina and once on a wild pig to recall a few times.
looking back at it, i am of the belief that it was not those animals day to die.
I've been taught, still believe, and have taught my sons, that if a shot does "Not feel right", DON"T take it; whether it's on the emotional or the physical level, it will usually not fare well if it's not "right".
another time that's still fresh in the memory was a time my son and i were hunting coyote in a remote canyon east of San Diego, in the high desert. i was using a .22 WMR and he was using a .22 long rifle.
he spotted what he believed to be a coyote through his scope but determined it was too far for the long rifle and told me to take the shot with the magnum round.
i focused the scope on the creature and settled the crosshairs on its chest, dead center (it was facing us directly head on) and noticed it was a fox...not a coyote. but certain species of fox are protected here in California...so...i just chuckled and watched it for a while through the scope.
my son asked why i didn't take the shot and i told him that it was a fox and i was not sure if it was a 'protected one' or not. (as i recall...and i could be wrong... there are three species in California...one which is protected, one is open year round and one you must get a tag for.)
my point here is that: we both made good, solid, CORRECT decisions. he was not certain of the capability of his rifle, i was not sure of my target. in all...a good day and an enriching experience.
all my sons are now grown men with families of their own. on more than one occasion, I've had them tell me: "It didn't feel right, Dad." i believe i did something right, would you agree?
Monday, March 21, 2011
Friday, March 18, 2011
I've shouldered a
great number of air rifles throughout the years but i think the two most outstanding ones I've had the pleasure to own are the Airforce Talon and the Benjamin Marauder; they're both PCP rifles.
there are, in existence, big bore air rifles, or i could modify my Airforce Talon by changing the barrel, air tank and valve to a larger bore, that are capable of taking big game such as elk, wild pigs and deer with available out there, but i choose to stop at the .25 caliber PCP. i have 'powder burning' rifles for that purpose; my air rifles are more for the smaller game and to 'plink' with around the property with so as not to disturb the neighbors and, the .25 caliber Marauder and .22 caliber Talon is capable of taking fair sized creatures out to around 70 yards. I've taken numerous, good sized rabbits at that yardage with the .22 and .25...they both knock them out of their tracks even at that range.
i had just finished doing some work on the Marauder recently and took it outside for a "test" after re-mounting the scope.
after shooting three shots to check 'zero' and being satisfied it was "on" i noticed something on an old tractor tire i have sitting in the southwest corner of the lot. i shouldered the rifle and peered thru the scope to see a ground squirrel sitting on it looking somewhat like a fur covered ten pins, pin.
these invasive creatures are cute, but, destructive and will render a field or meadow useless in very short order by way of burrowing, just like over sized gophers or prairie dogs, they'll have the place looking like moon scape terrain. not only that, but squirrels, especially ground squirrels, are known sources of the spreading of plague and carry other diseases as well. to me, they're on a par with their relatives, rats and mice.
i opened the bolt slowly and cautiously making sure to cock the hammer as quietly as possible, dropped a huge, .25 caliber JSB diabolo, pellet into the single shot tray, and slowly closed the bolt making sure the pellet fed into the chamber smoothly and correctly.
i lined up the Tech Force 4-12x power scope while adjusting the AO for correct yardage and sight picture all the while centering the heavy reticle cross hairs amidships of the offensive creature; it ranged out to be 68 yards by my Opti-logic, laser range finder.
the Marauder has a wonderful trigger with an ever so sweet, crisp, pull and break. i "snicked" off the safety, began my breathing routine, exhaled, held the thick cross hairs right on the middle of the chest of the squirrel and squeezed the trigger.
the mechanical "tink" sound that eliminates from the marauder tells me the shot has taken off as there is no recoil what so ever from PCP rifles and i see the squirrel literally, explode, in the scope. it was a good shot. one less vermin to destroy the meadow and leave a mess in our tack shed.
closer examination of the carcass showed that the pellet had struck 1/2" low of my aiming point...not bad by any stretch of the imagination; i was one click off.
didn't matter to the squirrel...
I'll continue to 'improve' my air rifle(s) if i feel the need to, but hey...i'm finding that if i want more/better performance...go to the next size up...most manufacturers have the basic platforms perfected, all you have to do is refine it.
there are, in existence, big bore air rifles, or i could modify my Airforce Talon by changing the barrel, air tank and valve to a larger bore, that are capable of taking big game such as elk, wild pigs and deer with available out there, but i choose to stop at the .25 caliber PCP. i have 'powder burning' rifles for that purpose; my air rifles are more for the smaller game and to 'plink' with around the property with so as not to disturb the neighbors and, the .25 caliber Marauder and .22 caliber Talon is capable of taking fair sized creatures out to around 70 yards. I've taken numerous, good sized rabbits at that yardage with the .22 and .25...they both knock them out of their tracks even at that range.
i had just finished doing some work on the Marauder recently and took it outside for a "test" after re-mounting the scope.
after shooting three shots to check 'zero' and being satisfied it was "on" i noticed something on an old tractor tire i have sitting in the southwest corner of the lot. i shouldered the rifle and peered thru the scope to see a ground squirrel sitting on it looking somewhat like a fur covered ten pins, pin.
these invasive creatures are cute, but, destructive and will render a field or meadow useless in very short order by way of burrowing, just like over sized gophers or prairie dogs, they'll have the place looking like moon scape terrain. not only that, but squirrels, especially ground squirrels, are known sources of the spreading of plague and carry other diseases as well. to me, they're on a par with their relatives, rats and mice.
i opened the bolt slowly and cautiously making sure to cock the hammer as quietly as possible, dropped a huge, .25 caliber JSB diabolo, pellet into the single shot tray, and slowly closed the bolt making sure the pellet fed into the chamber smoothly and correctly.
i lined up the Tech Force 4-12x power scope while adjusting the AO for correct yardage and sight picture all the while centering the heavy reticle cross hairs amidships of the offensive creature; it ranged out to be 68 yards by my Opti-logic, laser range finder.
the Marauder has a wonderful trigger with an ever so sweet, crisp, pull and break. i "snicked" off the safety, began my breathing routine, exhaled, held the thick cross hairs right on the middle of the chest of the squirrel and squeezed the trigger.
the mechanical "tink" sound that eliminates from the marauder tells me the shot has taken off as there is no recoil what so ever from PCP rifles and i see the squirrel literally, explode, in the scope. it was a good shot. one less vermin to destroy the meadow and leave a mess in our tack shed.
closer examination of the carcass showed that the pellet had struck 1/2" low of my aiming point...not bad by any stretch of the imagination; i was one click off.
didn't matter to the squirrel...
I'll continue to 'improve' my air rifle(s) if i feel the need to, but hey...i'm finding that if i want more/better performance...go to the next size up...most manufacturers have the basic platforms perfected, all you have to do is refine it.
Friday, March 4, 2011
lots has
gone on since my last entry.
i got a rebuild kit for my Beeman RX-1; I'll undertake that in the future.
i pulled the bolt of the 25 Marauder and polished the air port and i discovered the "O" ring seal for the breech/probe had slipped out of it's groove. once replaced, it improved the performance dramatically.
i made a brace for the boquiver on the Hoyt GameMaster and that aided it vastly, too. i also installed an elevated arrow-rest on it. it works well, too.
the weather has finally settled down to where i can shoot my bow(s)regularly now. I'm thinking of advertising a trade for lighter limbs for my Quinn Stallion. right now i have 55 lb limbs for it; way to heavy for me at the moment.
i got a rebuild kit for my Beeman RX-1; I'll undertake that in the future.
i pulled the bolt of the 25 Marauder and polished the air port and i discovered the "O" ring seal for the breech/probe had slipped out of it's groove. once replaced, it improved the performance dramatically.
i made a brace for the boquiver on the Hoyt GameMaster and that aided it vastly, too. i also installed an elevated arrow-rest on it. it works well, too.
the weather has finally settled down to where i can shoot my bow(s)regularly now. I'm thinking of advertising a trade for lighter limbs for my Quinn Stallion. right now i have 55 lb limbs for it; way to heavy for me at the moment.
Saturday, January 15, 2011
i got back a scope i sent back
on a warranty claim and i must say...i am impressed with the customer service.
no questions asked. they simply replace the defective one with a newer and better one.
where i made a mistake is i selected the wrong scope for MY use. it's an 8-32x scope for a .308 Winchester.
seldom do i ever shoot more than 300 maybe 400 yards. so...do i need a scope of that magnitude? probably not.
no matter.
I'll have to 'zero' at 200 yards as i have a 20 MOA scope mount base it's mounted on so zeroing at 100 yards may be next to impossible.
over the years, i accumulated a number of scopes. some good, a few, not so good.
I've finally come to realize that the more a person can afford to pay, the better quality scope he will have...duhhhhh...
i have three top name scopes that cost into the four figures and i would not part with any of them. they are more than i could hope for for what i use them for.
i think the best thing i could have/should have done would be to configure the mounts so i could transfer them to any rifle i have.
but each rifle and each scope has a different application designation so it changes things...a 4x is really not too good for long range shooting (200 yds plus) and a 8x is too much for short range (100 yards and less) it gets challenging to arrive at the best solution (not to mention expense)
then...i get into another area...I'm also an avid airgunner...i like PCP air rifles and have two quality PCP's at the moment. but...air rifles are limited, normally, to less than 100 yards so...do i really need a $1000.00 scope in 10x? for the largest part...no.
it gets better and more complex as the issue expands.
one day...I'm gonna sort it out...
no questions asked. they simply replace the defective one with a newer and better one.
where i made a mistake is i selected the wrong scope for MY use. it's an 8-32x scope for a .308 Winchester.
seldom do i ever shoot more than 300 maybe 400 yards. so...do i need a scope of that magnitude? probably not.
no matter.
I'll have to 'zero' at 200 yards as i have a 20 MOA scope mount base it's mounted on so zeroing at 100 yards may be next to impossible.
over the years, i accumulated a number of scopes. some good, a few, not so good.
I've finally come to realize that the more a person can afford to pay, the better quality scope he will have...duhhhhh...
i have three top name scopes that cost into the four figures and i would not part with any of them. they are more than i could hope for for what i use them for.
i think the best thing i could have/should have done would be to configure the mounts so i could transfer them to any rifle i have.
but each rifle and each scope has a different application designation so it changes things...a 4x is really not too good for long range shooting (200 yds plus) and a 8x is too much for short range (100 yards and less) it gets challenging to arrive at the best solution (not to mention expense)
then...i get into another area...I'm also an avid airgunner...i like PCP air rifles and have two quality PCP's at the moment. but...air rifles are limited, normally, to less than 100 yards so...do i really need a $1000.00 scope in 10x? for the largest part...no.
it gets better and more complex as the issue expands.
one day...I'm gonna sort it out...
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
i've made
the decision to get an AR.
i decided to get a complete .22 caliber lr AR that will accept 5.56 'uppers' as well so i will be able to enjoy the best of both worlds.
the only "catch" is that i have to decided whether or not I'm going to have a "bullet button" installed all the time or, if practical, remove it when using the .22 lr as it's not required on rimfire detachable magazine, semi-automatic rifles in the state of kaliphornia. (not yet, anyway. i suspect with Jerry brown and the idiot Gavin newsome coming in to power, there may be monumental changes in firearms laws in California.)
right now, there's a buying frenzy of AR's, and handgun ammo, in California due to the changes that're coming. like many others i am going to get what i can, while i can, before the legislators panic and try to shut the door of opportunity for us to have and own AR's.
anyway...
i decided on the M4 platform as it's lighter, shorter and easier to handle. the only other runner-up in my decision weighed in at a hefty 9.7 lbs without optics or ammo; add a good quality scope, a bi-pod and 10 rounds of 5.56 and you've got a rifle that will be near the 12 lb. mark...not exactly a light-weight...
geeeeee...my savage 12fv in .308 Winchester in the tech 2000 stock and with the Barska scope weights in at 14 lbs WITHOUT a bi-pod. I've decided that if I'm going to do any "long range" shooting, the 12fv is the way to go. i also have an 'intermediate' rifle, a rem 700 BDL in 22-250 that can be accurate to the extreme at longer .22 caliber ranges and is capable of shooting the heavier .22 cal bullets...and...last but not least...with the 5.56 i can have a good short to intermediate range SD carbine. (i do also have a Ruger PC9 carbine and a Remington 870 that's highly capable for very close CQB/SD encounters should i ever have the need.)
to be honest, i have my thoughts about having to use any of my firearms as SD tools.
right now (in our historical, political, societal and cultural positions, it's not exactly what I'd call "a bowl of cherries") i feel there's a very good chance that we, the U.S., will surely break apart in the not to distant future.
it's a historical fact that no "empire" lasts long. each and every one of them is formed out of the fermentation of revolution of some sort, rises rapidly to power, enters a plateau of that power, becomes complacent where everyone demands "rights" to extremes, becomes oppressive to it's citizenry as a results of those "rights" and eventually declines in to decay, moral rot and chaos.
from what I'm seeing and hearing in the news, we, the United States, are in the last stages. like it or not. all one has to do is to look around and the signs are all there and very evident to even the most casual of observers.
with that in mind, it may behoove a person to have some SD capabilities ready and able to use should the need arise; hence the AR, PC9 and Remington 870.
probably the only real disadvantage to the M4 is that it's a 16" tube and I'm not sure that's truly a "disadvantage" per-se. another feature of the M16/M4 platform is the changes that can be done by the owner/operator with minimum effort and expense.
i will be able to switch between an A2 and a number of other "tactical" butt stocks and forearms should i choose to, there is an endless array of optics and lighting accessories that are available and. at the moment, ammo is still available, accessible and still affordable.
for years, i was NOT an advocate of the AR or the 5.56 AS A COMBAT cartridge and the M16 had proven to be very unreliable and controversial due to it's many short-comings and fatal flaws during the Vietnam war. too many soldiers and marines died because of those short-comings.
not only that, but i was in the U.S. Army at the beginning of the war in Vietnam and spent time over there on that peninsula at that time. i was armed and trained with the M1 Carbine and M1 Garand not to mention the Browning M1919 machine gun and was, later, issued an M14 rifle; you might say i was "biased" towards the .30 caliber cartridges.
i also had purchased a Ruger Mini-14 in .223 shortly after they came into production and i was NOT satisfied with it's accuracy at all. Ruger addressed that issue later down the road, though.
i believe the AR platform, after being "adjusted" is a suitable platform, that the 5.56 cartridge is, still, NOT a suitable combat cartridge and from the looks of it, I'm correct as the military has begun a switch back to a .30 caliber, albeit a shorter version, for the rigors and demands of a capable cartridge in the form of the 6.9mm Grendell and 6.8mm SPC (Special Purpose Cartridge) and the 7.62 NATO has returned bigger than ever in the hands of "Special Ops" groups such as Navy SEALs, army green berets and such.
evidence of that also lies in the world-wide success of the AK47 and SKS series rifles; they're 7.62mm x 39mm cartridges and in spite of all the AR/M16 advocates here, (especially those that have not faced the AK or SKS in battle) has become the most prolific and successful battle rifles ever developed...even over the M1 Garand.
the way it has evolved now, is that the 5.56 is employed more for CQB where encounters are seldom over 100 yards such as in door-to-door fighting in cities.
i read a staggering statistic about the war in Vietnam that said that the average "kill" by an infantryman was within 40 yards. even then, i, personally, know men who shot enemy combatants within that range and it failed to kill them. to further bolster that fact, our own General Petreaus, now commander of our forces in Afghanistan, was shot in the chest, in a training accident, at Ft.Bragg, N.C. at point blank range, and survives now to command our forces. not a very convincing testimony for the 5.56 as a combat cartridge is it? had that shot been from a 7.62 NATO...i think the outcome would have been much different.
i believe it's being delegated into becoming a "specialized" cartridge for very close encounters, in very special locales such as in cities or urban environments where it's more than likely the opposing combatants will NOT be "armored up" and where law enforcement deal with singular, unsophisticated threats; the 5.56 simply does not have the 'punch' of the .30 calibers but does work well in limited applications.
be that as it may...i like the 5.56/.223 for a sporting cartridge. it has very little recoil, has very good speed to size ratio, is a proven 'varmint' round and from what I'm seeing, is being more widely accepted to hunt up to deer sized game with effectively, has been proven to be extremely accurate, is fairly economic in use and readily available country wide; not a bad selection if you keep those limitations AND good points in mind.
i decided to get a complete .22 caliber lr AR that will accept 5.56 'uppers' as well so i will be able to enjoy the best of both worlds.
the only "catch" is that i have to decided whether or not I'm going to have a "bullet button" installed all the time or, if practical, remove it when using the .22 lr as it's not required on rimfire detachable magazine, semi-automatic rifles in the state of kaliphornia. (not yet, anyway. i suspect with Jerry brown and the idiot Gavin newsome coming in to power, there may be monumental changes in firearms laws in California.)
right now, there's a buying frenzy of AR's, and handgun ammo, in California due to the changes that're coming. like many others i am going to get what i can, while i can, before the legislators panic and try to shut the door of opportunity for us to have and own AR's.
anyway...
i decided on the M4 platform as it's lighter, shorter and easier to handle. the only other runner-up in my decision weighed in at a hefty 9.7 lbs without optics or ammo; add a good quality scope, a bi-pod and 10 rounds of 5.56 and you've got a rifle that will be near the 12 lb. mark...not exactly a light-weight...
geeeeee...my savage 12fv in .308 Winchester in the tech 2000 stock and with the Barska scope weights in at 14 lbs WITHOUT a bi-pod. I've decided that if I'm going to do any "long range" shooting, the 12fv is the way to go. i also have an 'intermediate' rifle, a rem 700 BDL in 22-250 that can be accurate to the extreme at longer .22 caliber ranges and is capable of shooting the heavier .22 cal bullets...and...last but not least...with the 5.56 i can have a good short to intermediate range SD carbine. (i do also have a Ruger PC9 carbine and a Remington 870 that's highly capable for very close CQB/SD encounters should i ever have the need.)
to be honest, i have my thoughts about having to use any of my firearms as SD tools.
right now (in our historical, political, societal and cultural positions, it's not exactly what I'd call "a bowl of cherries") i feel there's a very good chance that we, the U.S., will surely break apart in the not to distant future.
it's a historical fact that no "empire" lasts long. each and every one of them is formed out of the fermentation of revolution of some sort, rises rapidly to power, enters a plateau of that power, becomes complacent where everyone demands "rights" to extremes, becomes oppressive to it's citizenry as a results of those "rights" and eventually declines in to decay, moral rot and chaos.
from what I'm seeing and hearing in the news, we, the United States, are in the last stages. like it or not. all one has to do is to look around and the signs are all there and very evident to even the most casual of observers.
with that in mind, it may behoove a person to have some SD capabilities ready and able to use should the need arise; hence the AR, PC9 and Remington 870.
probably the only real disadvantage to the M4 is that it's a 16" tube and I'm not sure that's truly a "disadvantage" per-se. another feature of the M16/M4 platform is the changes that can be done by the owner/operator with minimum effort and expense.
i will be able to switch between an A2 and a number of other "tactical" butt stocks and forearms should i choose to, there is an endless array of optics and lighting accessories that are available and. at the moment, ammo is still available, accessible and still affordable.
for years, i was NOT an advocate of the AR or the 5.56 AS A COMBAT cartridge and the M16 had proven to be very unreliable and controversial due to it's many short-comings and fatal flaws during the Vietnam war. too many soldiers and marines died because of those short-comings.
not only that, but i was in the U.S. Army at the beginning of the war in Vietnam and spent time over there on that peninsula at that time. i was armed and trained with the M1 Carbine and M1 Garand not to mention the Browning M1919 machine gun and was, later, issued an M14 rifle; you might say i was "biased" towards the .30 caliber cartridges.
i also had purchased a Ruger Mini-14 in .223 shortly after they came into production and i was NOT satisfied with it's accuracy at all. Ruger addressed that issue later down the road, though.
i believe the AR platform, after being "adjusted" is a suitable platform, that the 5.56 cartridge is, still, NOT a suitable combat cartridge and from the looks of it, I'm correct as the military has begun a switch back to a .30 caliber, albeit a shorter version, for the rigors and demands of a capable cartridge in the form of the 6.9mm Grendell and 6.8mm SPC (Special Purpose Cartridge) and the 7.62 NATO has returned bigger than ever in the hands of "Special Ops" groups such as Navy SEALs, army green berets and such.
evidence of that also lies in the world-wide success of the AK47 and SKS series rifles; they're 7.62mm x 39mm cartridges and in spite of all the AR/M16 advocates here, (especially those that have not faced the AK or SKS in battle) has become the most prolific and successful battle rifles ever developed...even over the M1 Garand.
the way it has evolved now, is that the 5.56 is employed more for CQB where encounters are seldom over 100 yards such as in door-to-door fighting in cities.
i read a staggering statistic about the war in Vietnam that said that the average "kill" by an infantryman was within 40 yards. even then, i, personally, know men who shot enemy combatants within that range and it failed to kill them. to further bolster that fact, our own General Petreaus, now commander of our forces in Afghanistan, was shot in the chest, in a training accident, at Ft.Bragg, N.C. at point blank range, and survives now to command our forces. not a very convincing testimony for the 5.56 as a combat cartridge is it? had that shot been from a 7.62 NATO...i think the outcome would have been much different.
i believe it's being delegated into becoming a "specialized" cartridge for very close encounters, in very special locales such as in cities or urban environments where it's more than likely the opposing combatants will NOT be "armored up" and where law enforcement deal with singular, unsophisticated threats; the 5.56 simply does not have the 'punch' of the .30 calibers but does work well in limited applications.
be that as it may...i like the 5.56/.223 for a sporting cartridge. it has very little recoil, has very good speed to size ratio, is a proven 'varmint' round and from what I'm seeing, is being more widely accepted to hunt up to deer sized game with effectively, has been proven to be extremely accurate, is fairly economic in use and readily available country wide; not a bad selection if you keep those limitations AND good points in mind.
Sunday, December 26, 2010
I've been
researching the world of the AR-15. some very interesting developments are taking place in that world now.
one is that there is a trend among legislators to be paranoid about the number of AR's there are now especially in California and the states bordering Mexico. and of course...the average gun owner and the "Mom and Pop gun stores along the border states" is to blame for all the violence according to Hillary Klinton. yet from the picture I've seen from weapons seizures, the source seem to be MILITARY sources...many, if not most, weapons are military in origin. such as M-60 machine guns, M16 rifles, M203's, M239 grenade launchers and hand grenades. there was even RPG's and a few small mortars.
yes, they're Vietnam era weapons but still highly effective when in properly trained hands.
now i ask you...do you know any "mom and Pop stores" where you may walk in and purchase hand grenades that are NOT inert? or a fully operational M60 machine gun?
c'mon Hillary...get real!
now there are numerous proposals to limit or curtail OUR rights because of the violence in Mexico.
it is common knowledge, and widely accepted, that once a right has been curtailed, seldom, if ever, does it get restored; another abuse from our so-called legislators...
make no mistake about it...the second amendment DOES verify the right of "the people" to own and keep firearms! that has been verified by the SCOTUS in the Heller decision. as much as that galls many, it is the law of the land whether they like it or not! every citizen that is not prohibited by law, is permitted by the constitution to own a firearm or firearms.
it's a shame that citizens have to take their own government(s) to court to re-affirm their rights isn't it?
as i see it, there's two reasons why violence is rampant in Mexico and the adjoining American cities:
1. the failure and continuing refusal of the federal government to seal and protect our sovereign border when they KNOW the existing problem(s).
2. the failure and refusal of the Mexican government to halt drug cartel activities in Mexico.
part of that failure is the involvement of the corrupt Mexican military "turning their head away" from the border when smuggling activities are concerned. it's even been said that the Mexican military have provided support and cover for smuggling activities.
now...the proposals are coming in hot and heavy to: track any, two or more, larger than .22 caliber, semi-automatic rifle with a detachable magazine sold in areas near the Mexican border.
how, may i ask, is that going to curtail the violence in Mexico? answer: IT AIN'T GONNA!
the only way the violence will be brought to an end will be thru the killing off of the cartel members who undertake such violent actions themselves. it's that simple.
if it takes 'special ops'...then do it...locate them, give them ONE chance to surrender and submit themselves to the authority of the Mexican government. if they rufuse...kill them.
but...the main problem now is that they've gone unchallenged for so long they've become powerful enough to challenge the government itself, that the government hasn't much power over the cartels. I've heard it said that the cartels are going to attempt a coup of the existing government. i could believe that if they had air and ground cover by way of air craft and artillery.
but Mexico has been historically, one of the most corrupt nations on the planet so effort from honest leaders are very difficult to sustain; the honest leadership seldom prevails.
it seems our leadership is not much better in many respects.
we need to get rid of Barry...get rid of him next election.
one is that there is a trend among legislators to be paranoid about the number of AR's there are now especially in California and the states bordering Mexico. and of course...the average gun owner and the "Mom and Pop gun stores along the border states" is to blame for all the violence according to Hillary Klinton. yet from the picture I've seen from weapons seizures, the source seem to be MILITARY sources...many, if not most, weapons are military in origin. such as M-60 machine guns, M16 rifles, M203's, M239 grenade launchers and hand grenades. there was even RPG's and a few small mortars.
yes, they're Vietnam era weapons but still highly effective when in properly trained hands.
now i ask you...do you know any "mom and Pop stores" where you may walk in and purchase hand grenades that are NOT inert? or a fully operational M60 machine gun?
c'mon Hillary...get real!
now there are numerous proposals to limit or curtail OUR rights because of the violence in Mexico.
it is common knowledge, and widely accepted, that once a right has been curtailed, seldom, if ever, does it get restored; another abuse from our so-called legislators...
make no mistake about it...the second amendment DOES verify the right of "the people" to own and keep firearms! that has been verified by the SCOTUS in the Heller decision. as much as that galls many, it is the law of the land whether they like it or not! every citizen that is not prohibited by law, is permitted by the constitution to own a firearm or firearms.
it's a shame that citizens have to take their own government(s) to court to re-affirm their rights isn't it?
as i see it, there's two reasons why violence is rampant in Mexico and the adjoining American cities:
1. the failure and continuing refusal of the federal government to seal and protect our sovereign border when they KNOW the existing problem(s).
2. the failure and refusal of the Mexican government to halt drug cartel activities in Mexico.
part of that failure is the involvement of the corrupt Mexican military "turning their head away" from the border when smuggling activities are concerned. it's even been said that the Mexican military have provided support and cover for smuggling activities.
now...the proposals are coming in hot and heavy to: track any, two or more, larger than .22 caliber, semi-automatic rifle with a detachable magazine sold in areas near the Mexican border.
how, may i ask, is that going to curtail the violence in Mexico? answer: IT AIN'T GONNA!
the only way the violence will be brought to an end will be thru the killing off of the cartel members who undertake such violent actions themselves. it's that simple.
if it takes 'special ops'...then do it...locate them, give them ONE chance to surrender and submit themselves to the authority of the Mexican government. if they rufuse...kill them.
but...the main problem now is that they've gone unchallenged for so long they've become powerful enough to challenge the government itself, that the government hasn't much power over the cartels. I've heard it said that the cartels are going to attempt a coup of the existing government. i could believe that if they had air and ground cover by way of air craft and artillery.
but Mexico has been historically, one of the most corrupt nations on the planet so effort from honest leaders are very difficult to sustain; the honest leadership seldom prevails.
it seems our leadership is not much better in many respects.
we need to get rid of Barry...get rid of him next election.
Friday, November 19, 2010
it's been
a while since i made an entry here so i guess I'd best get to it, huh?
I've been doing some 'upgrades' on my equipment.
I've taken apart the bolts of four of my rimfire rifles and stoned, cleaned and polished all parts that could be done; all work very well now.
i have two very fine, high quality rimfire rifles that need little, if any, upgrading or improvement(s) yet i still took apart the bolts and honed the extractors; it did enhance the operation.
I've had a long time affair with rimfire firearms. in fact, since i was a 13 year old kid in Oklahoma where i worked for and saved the cash to purchase a single shot, bolt action, .22 rimfire rifle; a Sears JC Higgins,(made by Marlin as the model 100)actually, my dad is the one who actually purchased it for me as i was not old enough to legally purchase a firearm.
i have that rifle to this day. it still shoots, but...it could use a new trigger. the trigger that's installed in it now was manufactured by a friend of mine as the original was lost somehow and it's showing a great deal of wear. it's a manually cocked model and has no safety device other than not to cock it until ready to shoot.
I'm certain i put thousands of rounds thru it and my sons have cycled uncounted thousands thru it as well, yet it, like the energizer bunny, "keeps on going".
i run hot and cold in my project to restore it and right now I'm in a 'cold' spell with it. someday i hope to have it fully restored. i researched it and as i recall it was made in 1936.
I've also come to a point in my shooting and hunting life where i believe there may be more of a "future" in rimfire due to the political environment and the violence along the American/Mexican border involving firearms as well as international arms talks involving the UN; i believe there will be an all out attempt to ban private ownership of any military/law enforcement grade weapons worldwide. especially in the area of AR's and semi-automatic, self-loading firearms.
i heard that one UN resolution has stated that shoulder fired small arms (mostly the propagation of the AK47) constitute the biggest threat to mankind in history and called for the banning of private ownership of them (shoulder fired, military grade, small arms.) worldwide and part of the resolution would include the banning of military grade caliber ammo such as 9mm Luger,.45 ACP, 5.56, 30-06, .303, 7-8mm Mauser and it goes on.
as i see it, and i see no evidence to support the beliefs, and if there were, anti-gun organizations would be throwing in the face of the public, the AR's, in the hands of law-abiding citizens, are NOT a national security threat of any sort, the threats are mostly in legislators warped, demented, reasoning. keep in mind...legislators do not think and reason like 'normal' persons.
with that in mind, i believe they will shun the .22 rimfire as not being a "threat" as they perceive a threat as being.
i personally believe the .22 rimfire is highly underrated in today's shooting culture as being "underpowered" and not worthy of consideration when considering "self-defense" or "survival" applications.
i certainly do not advocate the use of a .22 rimfire for the taking of "big" game, under normal circumstances, or for long range applications (by long range, i mean in the area of 100 yards/90 meters and farther and by "big game" i mean deer sized and larger animals.)it simply hasn't the energy to perform the necessary task to penetrate big game animals, or human threats, at ranges over those and the energy it does have is severely limited even within the confines of those ranges on bigger animals.
the .22 rimfire does have merits that make it worth considering as an overall wise choice for use, though. it's very economical for one. being economical also means one can afford to practice/train more often to become proficient with the chosen arm. it's quite capable for the taking of most small game, can be had in extremely accurate loadings, there is negligibly felt recoil from virtually every rimfire firearm available. just to name a few reasons.
as far as it being a choice in the arena of self defense cartridges, it does not rank very well. almost every handgun cartridge around, sans the .25 ACP, would be a better choice. (as far as handguns are concerned)nevertheless, in a situation where i could select a .22 rimfire rife/carbine, i think it's a valid choice as long as one is not faced with contending with an armored up aggressor. velocities a 40 grain bullet can attain from a .22 rimfire rifle are quite respectable...some as high as 1600 FPS...certainly not to be shunned. with all the .22 caliber rimfire variants available in the AR platform now days it's hard for me to believe that in a "face down" situation an aggressor would be able to look down the bore and scoff at a .22 cal...after all, bore size is .22 for an AR/M4/M16 also.
the venerable Ruger 10/22, as an example, is available for less than $300 brand new anywhere in the country and it is without doubt, the premier, one of the most stalwart examples of the semi-automatic carbines ever designed. it's highly reliable, rugged, accurate and will digest almost any .22 long rifle fodder on the planet.
now, couple that up with the ability of a shooter to be able to empty a 10 round (California law prohibits magazines in semi-auto firearms to no more than 10 rounds, but most other states have no limit.) magazine into a 3" circle, rapid fire, within 20 yards using high-velocity, 40 grain bullet, rounds...that, my friends, is 400 grains of lead, nearly one ounce, hitting a target in near milliseconds...what do you think? i think the results would be sobering, to say the least.
with all that in mind, one must also accept the fact that it is probably the most widely available ammo and firearm available now.
in the end...i think one could do worse than ending up with a selection of .22 rimfires...at least they prove to be more practical than most we now see...
just my opinion.
I've been doing some 'upgrades' on my equipment.
I've taken apart the bolts of four of my rimfire rifles and stoned, cleaned and polished all parts that could be done; all work very well now.
i have two very fine, high quality rimfire rifles that need little, if any, upgrading or improvement(s) yet i still took apart the bolts and honed the extractors; it did enhance the operation.
I've had a long time affair with rimfire firearms. in fact, since i was a 13 year old kid in Oklahoma where i worked for and saved the cash to purchase a single shot, bolt action, .22 rimfire rifle; a Sears JC Higgins,(made by Marlin as the model 100)actually, my dad is the one who actually purchased it for me as i was not old enough to legally purchase a firearm.
i have that rifle to this day. it still shoots, but...it could use a new trigger. the trigger that's installed in it now was manufactured by a friend of mine as the original was lost somehow and it's showing a great deal of wear. it's a manually cocked model and has no safety device other than not to cock it until ready to shoot.
I'm certain i put thousands of rounds thru it and my sons have cycled uncounted thousands thru it as well, yet it, like the energizer bunny, "keeps on going".
i run hot and cold in my project to restore it and right now I'm in a 'cold' spell with it. someday i hope to have it fully restored. i researched it and as i recall it was made in 1936.
I've also come to a point in my shooting and hunting life where i believe there may be more of a "future" in rimfire due to the political environment and the violence along the American/Mexican border involving firearms as well as international arms talks involving the UN; i believe there will be an all out attempt to ban private ownership of any military/law enforcement grade weapons worldwide. especially in the area of AR's and semi-automatic, self-loading firearms.
i heard that one UN resolution has stated that shoulder fired small arms (mostly the propagation of the AK47) constitute the biggest threat to mankind in history and called for the banning of private ownership of them (shoulder fired, military grade, small arms.) worldwide and part of the resolution would include the banning of military grade caliber ammo such as 9mm Luger,.45 ACP, 5.56, 30-06, .303, 7-8mm Mauser and it goes on.
as i see it, and i see no evidence to support the beliefs, and if there were, anti-gun organizations would be throwing in the face of the public, the AR's, in the hands of law-abiding citizens, are NOT a national security threat of any sort, the threats are mostly in legislators warped, demented, reasoning. keep in mind...legislators do not think and reason like 'normal' persons.
with that in mind, i believe they will shun the .22 rimfire as not being a "threat" as they perceive a threat as being.
i personally believe the .22 rimfire is highly underrated in today's shooting culture as being "underpowered" and not worthy of consideration when considering "self-defense" or "survival" applications.
i certainly do not advocate the use of a .22 rimfire for the taking of "big" game, under normal circumstances, or for long range applications (by long range, i mean in the area of 100 yards/90 meters and farther and by "big game" i mean deer sized and larger animals.)it simply hasn't the energy to perform the necessary task to penetrate big game animals, or human threats, at ranges over those and the energy it does have is severely limited even within the confines of those ranges on bigger animals.
the .22 rimfire does have merits that make it worth considering as an overall wise choice for use, though. it's very economical for one. being economical also means one can afford to practice/train more often to become proficient with the chosen arm. it's quite capable for the taking of most small game, can be had in extremely accurate loadings, there is negligibly felt recoil from virtually every rimfire firearm available. just to name a few reasons.
as far as it being a choice in the arena of self defense cartridges, it does not rank very well. almost every handgun cartridge around, sans the .25 ACP, would be a better choice. (as far as handguns are concerned)nevertheless, in a situation where i could select a .22 rimfire rife/carbine, i think it's a valid choice as long as one is not faced with contending with an armored up aggressor. velocities a 40 grain bullet can attain from a .22 rimfire rifle are quite respectable...some as high as 1600 FPS...certainly not to be shunned. with all the .22 caliber rimfire variants available in the AR platform now days it's hard for me to believe that in a "face down" situation an aggressor would be able to look down the bore and scoff at a .22 cal...after all, bore size is .22 for an AR/M4/M16 also.
the venerable Ruger 10/22, as an example, is available for less than $300 brand new anywhere in the country and it is without doubt, the premier, one of the most stalwart examples of the semi-automatic carbines ever designed. it's highly reliable, rugged, accurate and will digest almost any .22 long rifle fodder on the planet.
now, couple that up with the ability of a shooter to be able to empty a 10 round (California law prohibits magazines in semi-auto firearms to no more than 10 rounds, but most other states have no limit.) magazine into a 3" circle, rapid fire, within 20 yards using high-velocity, 40 grain bullet, rounds...that, my friends, is 400 grains of lead, nearly one ounce, hitting a target in near milliseconds...what do you think? i think the results would be sobering, to say the least.
with all that in mind, one must also accept the fact that it is probably the most widely available ammo and firearm available now.
in the end...i think one could do worse than ending up with a selection of .22 rimfires...at least they prove to be more practical than most we now see...
just my opinion.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
